I’m intrigued as to why an article about cannabis law cites to an article I wrote over thirty years ago about copyright fair use in postmodern art. But the Tulsa Law Review has paywalled their prestigious journal, forcing me to pay if I want to find out, and honestly, I’m not quite that intrigued.
By the way, you can download my article for free, and there is even an update here.
I think Google is just confused! There’s an article in the same issue called “In Defense of Appropriation Art” by Blake A. Chrismer that may actually have the citation. Google probably just failed to segment the issue properly.
That sounds more likely!